Designing a Conceptual Model of Emotion Regulation in Individuals with Non-Suicidal Self-Injurious Behaviors
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61838/35431Keywords:
non-suicidal self-injury, emotion regulation, thematic analysis, conceptual model, semi-structured interview, TehranAbstract
This study aimed to design a conceptual model of emotion regulation among individuals with non-suicidal self-injurious behaviors. This qualitative study was conducted using an inductive thematic analysis approach. The research population consisted of individuals with a history of non-suicidal self-injury in Tehran. Participants were selected through purposive and theoretical sampling, and recruitment continued until theoretical saturation was reached. A total of 24 participants, including 14 women and 10 men aged 18 to 34 years, participated in the study. Data were collected exclusively through semi-structured interviews. After informed consent was obtained, interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analyzed using NVivo software. Credibility and trustworthiness were strengthened through participant checking, peer review, analytic memo writing, and constant comparison of codes and categories. Data analysis led to the extraction of five main categories: “accumulation of intolerable emotions,” “difficulty identifying and accepting emotions,” “self-injury as immediate emotion regulation,” “the cycle of shame, secrecy, and renewed tension,” and “repairing factors and alternative pathways of emotion regulation.” The conceptual model indicated that, for many participants, non-suicidal self-injury was not experienced as an intention to die, but as a rapid, bodily, and short-term strategy for reducing emotional tension, interrupting rumination, ending emotional numbness, or punishing the self. The findings suggest that non-suicidal self-injury can be understood as a cycle involving emotional dysregulation, impaired affective processing, bodily discharge of distress, temporary relief, and the return of shame. Therefore, effective clinical interventions should move beyond behavioral suppression and focus on emotional literacy, distress tolerance, reduction of self-criticism, interpersonal skills, and the development of alternative emotion-regulation pathways.
Downloads
References
American Psychiatric Association. (2022). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed., text rev.). American Psychiatric Association Publishing.
Barkley, R. A. (2013). Defiant children: A clinician’s manual for assessment and parent training (3rd ed.). Guilford Press.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021). Thematic analysis: A practical guide. SAGE.
Burke, J. D., Loeber, R., & Birmaher, B. (2002). Oppositional defiant disorder and conduct disorder: A review of the past 10 years, Part II. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 41(11), 1275–1293. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004583-200211000-00009
Eisenberg, N., Cumberland, A., & Spinrad, T. L. (1998). Parental socialization of emotion. Psychological Inquiry, 9(4), 241–273. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327965pli0904_1
Eyberg, S. M., Nelson, M. M., & Boggs, S. R. (2008). Evidence-based psychosocial treatments for children and adolescents with disruptive behavior. Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology, 37(1), 215–237. https://doi.org/10.1080/15374410701820117
Frick, P. J., & Nigg, J. T. (2012). Current issues in the diagnosis of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, oppositional defiant disorder, and conduct disorder. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 8, 77–107. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-032511-143150
Helander, M., Asperholm, M., Wetterborg, D., Öst, L.-G., Hellner, C., Herlitz, A., & Enebrink, P. (2024). The efficacy of parent management training with or without involving the child in the treatment among children with clinical levels of disruptive behavior: A meta-analysis. Child Psychiatry & Human Development, 55, 164–181. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10578-022-01367-y
Kazdin, A. E. (2005). Parent management training: Treatment for oppositional, aggressive, and antisocial behavior in children and adolescents. Oxford University Press.
Kallio, H., Pietilä, A.-M., Johnson, M., & Kangasniemi, M. (2016). Systematic methodological review: Developing a framework for a qualitative semi-structured interview guide. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 72(12), 2954–2965. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.13031
Lin, X., He, T., Heath, M. A., Chi, P., & Hinshaw, S. P. (2022). A systematic review of multiple family factors associated with oppositional defiant disorder. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(17), 10866. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191710866
Lin, X., Li, Y., Xu, S., Ding, W., Zhou, Q., Du, H., & Chi, P. (2019). Family risk factors associated with oppositional defiant disorder symptoms, depressive symptoms, and aggressive behaviors among Chinese children with oppositional defiant disorder. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 2062. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02062
McMahon, R. J., & Forehand, R. L. (2003). Helping the noncompliant child: Family-based treatment for oppositional behavior (2nd ed.). Guilford Press.
Nock, M. K., Kazdin, A. E., Hiripi, E., & Kessler, R. C. (2007). Lifetime prevalence, correlates, and persistence of oppositional defiant disorder: Results from the National Comorbidity Survey Replication. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 48(7), 703–713. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.2007.01733.x
Nowell, L. S., Norris, J. M., White, D. E., & Moules, N. J. (2017). Thematic analysis: Striving to meet trustworthiness criteria. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917733847
Patterson, G. R. (1982). Coercive family process. Castalia.
Patterson, G. R., Reid, J. B., & Dishion, T. J. (1992). Antisocial boys. Castalia.
Pinquart, M. (2017). Associations of parenting dimensions and styles with externalizing problems of children and adolescents: An updated meta-analysis. Developmental Psychology, 53(5), 873–932.
Downloads
Publication Timeline
- Submitted
- Revised
- Accepted
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.